Jose Marti's Liberative Political Theology (e-bog) af Torre, Miguel A. De La

Jose Marti's Liberative Political Theology e-bog

202,96 DKK (inkl. moms 253,70 DKK)
Jose Marts Liberative Political Theology argues that Marts religious views, which at first glance might appear outdated and irrelevant, are actually critical to understanding his social vision. During a time in which the predominant philosophical view was materialistic (e.g., Darwin, Marx), Mart sought to reconcile social and political trends with the metaphysical, believing that ignoring the s...
E-bog 202,96 DKK
Forfattere Torre, Miguel A. De La (forfatter)
Udgivet 15 maj 2021
Længde 302 sider
Genrer 1KJC
Sprog English
Format epub
Beskyttelse LCP
ISBN 9780826501691
Jose Marts Liberative Political Theology argues that Marts religious views, which at first glance might appear outdated and irrelevant, are actually critical to understanding his social vision. During a time in which the predominant philosophical view was materialistic (e.g., Darwin, Marx), Mart sought to reconcile social and political trends with the metaphysical, believing that ignoring the spiritual would create a soulless approach toward achieving a liberative society. As such, Mart used religious concepts and ideas as tools that could bring forth a more just social order. In short, this book argues Mart could be considered a precursor to what would come to be called liberation theology. Miguel De La Torre has authored the most comprehensive text written thus far concerning Marts religious views and how they affected his political thought. The few similar texts that exist are written in Spanish, and most of them romanticize Marts spirituality in an attempt to portray him as a ';Christian believer.' Only a handful provide an academic investigation of Marts theological thought based solely on his writings, and those concentrate on just one aspect of Marts religious influences. Jose Marts Liberative Political Theology allows for mutual influence between Marts political and religious views, rather than assuming one had precedence over the other.