Rewriting Language e-bog
39,06 DKK
(inkl. moms 48,82 DKK)
Inclusive language remains a hot topic. Despite decades of empirical evidence and revisions of formal language use, many inclusive adaptations of English and German continue to be ignored or contested. But how to convince speakers of the importance of inclusive language? Rewriting Language provides one possible answer: by engaging readers with the issue, literary texts can help to raise awarene...
E-bog
39,06 DKK
Forlag
UCL Press
Udgivet
6 februar 2020
Længde
204 sider
Genrer
Language and Linguistics
Sprog
English
Format
epub
Beskyttelse
LCP
ISBN
9781787356702
Inclusive language remains a hot topic. Despite decades of empirical evidence and revisions of formal language use, many inclusive adaptations of English and German continue to be ignored or contested. But how to convince speakers of the importance of inclusive language? Rewriting Language provides one possible answer: by engaging readers with the issue, literary texts can help to raise awareness and thereby promote wider linguistic change. Christiane Luck analyses five iconic texts from a literary, linguistic and sociological perspective. She shows how Ursula K. Le Guin's The Left Hand of Darkness and Verena Stefan's Hautungen highlight the issues inherent in the linguistic status quo; Marge Piercy's Woman on the Edge of Time and June Arnold's The Cook and the Carpenter explore the possibilities and challenges of linguistic neutrality; and Gerd Brantenberg's Egalias dotre reverses linguistic norms to illustrate the link between language and imagination. A focus group study provides empirical evidence for the effectiveness of the literary approaches and shows how literary texts can sensitise readers to the impact of biased language. Particularly in the context of education, Luck concludes, literary texts can be a valuable tool to promote inclusive language use. Praise for Rewriting Language'An important contribution to feminist linguistics and sets forth a model that other researchers can build on, even as she reminds us that sexist value systems are too deeply engrained to be easily displaced by more egalitarian linguistic systems.'Gender and Language