Model Selection and Inference (e-bog) af Anderson, David R.
Anderson, David R. (forfatter)

Model Selection and Inference e-bog

692,63 DKK (inkl. moms 865,79 DKK)
We wrote this book to introduce graduate students and research workers in var- ious scientific disciplines to the use of information-theoretic approaches in the analysis of empirical data. In its fully developed form, the information-theoretic approach allows inference based on more than one model (including estimates of unconditional precision); in its initial form, it is useful in selecting a...
E-bog 692,63 DKK
Forfattere Anderson, David R. (forfatter)
Forlag Springer
Udgivet 11 november 2013
Genrer Probability and statistics
Sprog English
Format pdf
Beskyttelse LCP
ISBN 9781475729177
We wrote this book to introduce graduate students and research workers in var- ious scientific disciplines to the use of information-theoretic approaches in the analysis of empirical data. In its fully developed form, the information-theoretic approach allows inference based on more than one model (including estimates of unconditional precision); in its initial form, it is useful in selecting a "e;best"e; model and ranking the remaining models. We believe that often the critical issue in data analysis is the selection of a good approximating model that best represents the inference supported by the data (an estimated "e;best approximating model"e;). In- formation theory includes the well-known Kullback-Leibler "e;distance"e; between two models (actually, probability distributions), and this represents a fundamental quantity in science. In 1973, Hirotugu Akaike derived an estimator of the (relative) Kullback-Leibler distance based on Fisher's maximized log-likelihood. His mea- sure, now called Akaike 's information criterion (AIC), provided a new paradigm for model selection in the analysis of empirical data. His approach, with a funda- mental link to information theory, is relatively simple and easy to use in practice, but little taught in statistics classes and far less understood in the applied sciences than should be the case. We do not accept the notion that there is a simple, "e;true model"e; in the biological sciences.